Stonehenge
September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
-- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Re: Stonehenge
On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=blue]
> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries. > > -- > > > > Martin in Zuid Holland[/color] I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back? |
Re: Stonehenge
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
<alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: [color=blue] >On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=green] >> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color][/color] [color=blue] >I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color] Quite possibly. -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Re: Stonehenge
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:48:17 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue] >On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman ><alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >[color=green] >>On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=darkred] >>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color][/color] >[color=green] >>I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color] > >Quite possibly.[/color] [url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2739159/Stonehenge-WAS-completely-round-5-000-year-mystery-solved-groundsman-couldn-t-water-circle-hosepipe-short.html[/url] -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Re: Stonehenge
Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman > <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >[color=green] >> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=darkred] >>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color][/color] >[color=green] >> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color] > > Quite possibly.[/color] There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere. -- Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad |
Re: Stonehenge
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
wrote: [color=blue] >Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=green] >> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman >> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >>[color=darkred] >>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote: >>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color] >>[color=darkred] >>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color] >> >> Quite possibly.[/color] > >There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.[/color] There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Re: Stonehenge
Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> > wrote: >[color=green] >> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=darkred] >>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman >>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote: >>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries. >>> >>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back? >>> >>> Quite possibly.[/color] >> >> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.[/color] > > There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's > Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article[/color] Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new discoveries! -- Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad |
Re: Stonehenge
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
wrote: [color=blue] >Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=green] >> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> >> wrote: >>[color=darkred] >>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman >>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote: >>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries. >>>> >>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back? >>>> >>>> Quite possibly. >>> >>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.[/color] >> >> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's >> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article[/color] > >Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new >discoveries![/color] Did you read it on a tablet? The positioning of the photos was irritating, even when using a 10.1" tablet. I was a bit surprised that this sort of survey hadn't been done before. Do some archeologists think that this sort of survey is cheating? -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Re: Stonehenge
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:25:07 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue] >On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> >wrote: >[color=green] >>Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=darkred] >>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman >>>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote: >>>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries. >>>>> >>>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back? >>>>> >>>>> Quite possibly. >>>> >>>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere. >>> >>> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's >>> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article[/color] >> >>Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new >>discoveries![/color] > >Did you read it on a tablet? The positioning of the photos was irritating, even >when using a 10.1" tablet. > >I was a bit surprised that this sort of survey hadn't been done before. Do some >archeologists think that this sort of survey is cheating?[/color] More discoveries. Read the comments. [url]http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/sep/01/stonehenge-dry-spell-grass-perfect-circle?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2[/url] -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Re: Stonehenge
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:16:59 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue] >On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:25:07 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote: >[color=green] >>On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> >>wrote: >>[color=darkred] >>>Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman >>>>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote: >>>>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back? >>>>>> >>>>>> Quite possibly. >>>>> >>>>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere. >>>> >>>> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's >>>> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article >>> >>>Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new >>>discoveries![/color] >> >>Did you read it on a tablet? The positioning of the photos was irritating, even >>when using a 10.1" tablet. >> >>I was a bit surprised that this sort of survey hadn't been done before. Do some >>archeologists think that this sort of survey is cheating?[/color] > >More discoveries. Read the comments. > >[url]http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/sep/01/stonehenge-dry-spell-grass-perfect-circle?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2[/url][/color] The TV programme is on BBC 2 on Thursday [url]http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/c4tkng/operation-stonehenge-what-lies-beneath--series-1---episode-1[/url] 1/2. Stonehenge is one of the most enigmatic and fascinating historical sites that this country has to offer, and that's largely for one reason - try as they might, historians have next to no idea what the huge stone monoliths were for, or how they got there. There's no end of theories, of course, but none of them so far have been conclusive. That may all be about to change, however. Recent revolutionary research has just been undertaken which, over the course of just a few years, has yielded some fascinating insights into the site. Drawing on this new data, archaeologists might finally be able to put to bed some of its mysteries, as this two-part programme reveals the five-year project's findings. -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Adesso sono le 20.28.01. |
Basato su: vBulletin versione 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Traduzione italiana a cura di: Downloadgratuito.net
www.ForumViaggiare.com
Ad Management by RedTyger