|
|
|
20-04-2007, 10.56.04
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:37:59 +0200, B
>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>[color=green]
>>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:47:21 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:02:06 +0200, B
>>>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:33:41 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Frankly, I think the thing about having the material *** to get access
>>>>>is nothing more than an urban myth. I've never known of anyone
>>>>>(directly or indirectly) that it's happened to. Think about how hard
>>>>>it would actually be to slice open and remove something.
>>>>
>>>>I was once mugged in the US. Two young men ran past me on opposite
>>>>sides. The one on the left grabbed my purse. The one on the right
>>>>sliced the pocket off my coat. He was so fast that I didn't notice
>>>>until hours later that the pocket was missing. There was nothing in
>>>>the pocket, but if there had been, he would have got it.
>>>
>>>He actually did it with a knife?[/color]
>>
>>I really don't know, as I was totally unaware of what he was doing. I
>>supposed that he had used a razor blade. However, it was cleanly
>>sliced away, leaving only thread ends hanging, and the cloth
>>underneath the pocket was not damaged at all.[/color]
>
>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
I don't think so. The pocket was well sewed on, and if it had been
ripped, I think it would have been evident (pulled, puckered,
whatever). It was cleanly separated from the coat. Also, I'm sure they
were after the pocket. That's why one ran to my right while the other
grabbed the purse, which was slung over my left shoulder. The whole
operation was done while they were running a a good clip.
[color=blue]
>
>Of course I'm only guessing based on your description, but I don't
>think they would try something as tricky as that. It was your bag that
>they were after.
>--
>---
>DFM - [url]http://www.deepfriedmars.com[/url]
>---[/color]
--
Barbara Vaughan
My email address is my first initial followed by my surname at libero dot it
I answer travel questions only in the newsgroup
|
20-04-2007, 10.56.04
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:37:59 +0200, B
>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>[color=green]
>>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:47:21 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:02:06 +0200, B
>>>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:33:41 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Frankly, I think the thing about having the material *** to get access
>>>>>is nothing more than an urban myth. I've never known of anyone
>>>>>(directly or indirectly) that it's happened to. Think about how hard
>>>>>it would actually be to slice open and remove something.
>>>>
>>>>I was once mugged in the US. Two young men ran past me on opposite
>>>>sides. The one on the left grabbed my purse. The one on the right
>>>>sliced the pocket off my coat. He was so fast that I didn't notice
>>>>until hours later that the pocket was missing. There was nothing in
>>>>the pocket, but if there had been, he would have got it.
>>>
>>>He actually did it with a knife?[/color]
>>
>>I really don't know, as I was totally unaware of what he was doing. I
>>supposed that he had used a razor blade. However, it was cleanly
>>sliced away, leaving only thread ends hanging, and the cloth
>>underneath the pocket was not damaged at all.[/color]
>
>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
I don't think so. The pocket was well sewed on, and if it had been
ripped, I think it would have been evident (pulled, puckered,
whatever). It was cleanly separated from the coat. Also, I'm sure they
were after the pocket. That's why one ran to my right while the other
grabbed the purse, which was slung over my left shoulder. The whole
operation was done while they were running a a good clip.
[color=blue]
>
>Of course I'm only guessing based on your description, but I don't
>think they would try something as tricky as that. It was your bag that
>they were after.
>--
>---
>DFM - [url]http://www.deepfriedmars.com[/url]
>---[/color]
--
Barbara Vaughan
My email address is my first initial followed by my surname at libero dot it
I answer travel questions only in the newsgroup
|
20-04-2007, 10.56.04
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:37:59 +0200, B
>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>[color=green]
>>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:47:21 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:02:06 +0200, B
>>>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:33:41 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Frankly, I think the thing about having the material *** to get access
>>>>>is nothing more than an urban myth. I've never known of anyone
>>>>>(directly or indirectly) that it's happened to. Think about how hard
>>>>>it would actually be to slice open and remove something.
>>>>
>>>>I was once mugged in the US. Two young men ran past me on opposite
>>>>sides. The one on the left grabbed my purse. The one on the right
>>>>sliced the pocket off my coat. He was so fast that I didn't notice
>>>>until hours later that the pocket was missing. There was nothing in
>>>>the pocket, but if there had been, he would have got it.
>>>
>>>He actually did it with a knife?[/color]
>>
>>I really don't know, as I was totally unaware of what he was doing. I
>>supposed that he had used a razor blade. However, it was cleanly
>>sliced away, leaving only thread ends hanging, and the cloth
>>underneath the pocket was not damaged at all.[/color]
>
>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
I don't think so. The pocket was well sewed on, and if it had been
ripped, I think it would have been evident (pulled, puckered,
whatever). It was cleanly separated from the coat. Also, I'm sure they
were after the pocket. That's why one ran to my right while the other
grabbed the purse, which was slung over my left shoulder. The whole
operation was done while they were running a a good clip.
[color=blue]
>
>Of course I'm only guessing based on your description, but I don't
>think they would try something as tricky as that. It was your bag that
>they were after.
>--
>---
>DFM - [url]http://www.deepfriedmars.com[/url]
>---[/color]
--
Barbara Vaughan
My email address is my first initial followed by my surname at libero dot it
I answer travel questions only in the newsgroup
|
20-04-2007, 10.56.04
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:37:59 +0200, B
>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>[color=green]
>>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:47:21 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:02:06 +0200, B
>>>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:33:41 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Frankly, I think the thing about having the material *** to get access
>>>>>is nothing more than an urban myth. I've never known of anyone
>>>>>(directly or indirectly) that it's happened to. Think about how hard
>>>>>it would actually be to slice open and remove something.
>>>>
>>>>I was once mugged in the US. Two young men ran past me on opposite
>>>>sides. The one on the left grabbed my purse. The one on the right
>>>>sliced the pocket off my coat. He was so fast that I didn't notice
>>>>until hours later that the pocket was missing. There was nothing in
>>>>the pocket, but if there had been, he would have got it.
>>>
>>>He actually did it with a knife?[/color]
>>
>>I really don't know, as I was totally unaware of what he was doing. I
>>supposed that he had used a razor blade. However, it was cleanly
>>sliced away, leaving only thread ends hanging, and the cloth
>>underneath the pocket was not damaged at all.[/color]
>
>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
I don't think so. The pocket was well sewed on, and if it had been
ripped, I think it would have been evident (pulled, puckered,
whatever). It was cleanly separated from the coat. Also, I'm sure they
were after the pocket. That's why one ran to my right while the other
grabbed the purse, which was slung over my left shoulder. The whole
operation was done while they were running a a good clip.
[color=blue]
>
>Of course I'm only guessing based on your description, but I don't
>think they would try something as tricky as that. It was your bag that
>they were after.
>--
>---
>DFM - [url]http://www.deepfriedmars.com[/url]
>---[/color]
--
Barbara Vaughan
My email address is my first initial followed by my surname at libero dot it
I answer travel questions only in the newsgroup
|
20-04-2007, 10.56.04
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:37:59 +0200, B
>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>[color=green]
>>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:47:21 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:02:06 +0200, B
>>>Vaughan<me@privacy.net> has scripted:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:33:41 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Frankly, I think the thing about having the material *** to get access
>>>>>is nothing more than an urban myth. I've never known of anyone
>>>>>(directly or indirectly) that it's happened to. Think about how hard
>>>>>it would actually be to slice open and remove something.
>>>>
>>>>I was once mugged in the US. Two young men ran past me on opposite
>>>>sides. The one on the left grabbed my purse. The one on the right
>>>>sliced the pocket off my coat. He was so fast that I didn't notice
>>>>until hours later that the pocket was missing. There was nothing in
>>>>the pocket, but if there had been, he would have got it.
>>>
>>>He actually did it with a knife?[/color]
>>
>>I really don't know, as I was totally unaware of what he was doing. I
>>supposed that he had used a razor blade. However, it was cleanly
>>sliced away, leaving only thread ends hanging, and the cloth
>>underneath the pocket was not damaged at all.[/color]
>
>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
I don't think so. The pocket was well sewed on, and if it had been
ripped, I think it would have been evident (pulled, puckered,
whatever). It was cleanly separated from the coat. Also, I'm sure they
were after the pocket. That's why one ran to my right while the other
grabbed the purse, which was slung over my left shoulder. The whole
operation was done while they were running a a good clip.
[color=blue]
>
>Of course I'm only guessing based on your description, but I don't
>think they would try something as tricky as that. It was your bag that
>they were after.
>--
>---
>DFM - [url]http://www.deepfriedmars.com[/url]
>---[/color]
--
Barbara Vaughan
My email address is my first initial followed by my surname at libero dot it
I answer travel questions only in the newsgroup
|
20-04-2007, 11.16.31
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
Following up to The Reid <dontuse@fellwalk.co.uk> :
[color=blue]
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
>
>forsooth, some *cutpurses* have serious skills.[/color]
hey nonny nonny, my Lord. Pray, let us sit on the carpet and think of happy
things.
--
Tim C.
|
20-04-2007, 11.16.31
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
Following up to The Reid <dontuse@fellwalk.co.uk> :
[color=blue]
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
>
>forsooth, some *cutpurses* have serious skills.[/color]
hey nonny nonny, my Lord. Pray, let us sit on the carpet and think of happy
things.
--
Tim C.
|
20-04-2007, 11.16.31
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
Following up to The Reid <dontuse@fellwalk.co.uk> :
[color=blue]
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
>
>forsooth, some *cutpurses* have serious skills.[/color]
hey nonny nonny, my Lord. Pray, let us sit on the carpet and think of happy
things.
--
Tim C.
|
20-04-2007, 11.16.31
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
Following up to The Reid <dontuse@fellwalk.co.uk> :
[color=blue]
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
>
>forsooth, some *cutpurses* have serious skills.[/color]
hey nonny nonny, my Lord. Pray, let us sit on the carpet and think of happy
things.
--
Tim C.
|
20-04-2007, 11.16.31
|
|
Re: Camera theft prevention
Following up to The Reid <dontuse@fellwalk.co.uk> :
[color=blue]
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:58 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>In that case he may have just ripped it off, or maybe it got caught on
>>something. It would take some serious skill to do that with a blade.[/color]
>
>forsooth, some *cutpurses* have serious skills.[/color]
hey nonny nonny, my Lord. Pray, let us sit on the carpet and think of happy
things.
--
Tim C.
|
Strumenti discussione |
Cerca in questa discussione |
|
|
Modalità visualizzazione |
Modalità lineare
|
Regole di scrittura
|
Tu non puoi inserire nuovi messaggi
Tu non puoi rispondere ai messaggi
Tu non puoi inviare files
Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
Il codice vB è Disattivato
Il codice [IMG] è Disattivato
Il codice HTML è Disattivato
|
|
|
Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Adesso sono le 11.33.47.
| |