|
|
|
31-08-2014, 10.02.40
|
|
Stonehenge
September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
31-08-2014, 12.55.01
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=blue]
> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
>
> --
>
>
>
> Martin in Zuid Holland[/color]
I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?
|
31-08-2014, 13.48.17
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
<alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=green]
>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
>I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color]
Quite possibly.
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
01-09-2014, 11.44.43
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:48:17 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
><alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
>>I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color]
>
>Quite possibly.[/color]
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2739159/Stonehenge-WAS-completely-round-5-000-year-mystery-solved-groundsman-couldn-t-water-circle-hosepipe-short.html[/url]
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
01-09-2014, 22.29.42
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color]
>
> Quite possibly.[/color]
There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.
--
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad
|
01-09-2014, 23.19.49
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=green]
>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.[/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?[/color]
>>
>> Quite possibly.[/color]
>
>There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.[/color]
There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's
Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
02-09-2014, 01.23.29
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
>>>
>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?
>>>
>>> Quite possibly.[/color]
>>
>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.[/color]
>
> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's
> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article[/color]
Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new
discoveries!
--
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad
|
02-09-2014, 10.25.07
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=green]
>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
>> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
>>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
>>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
>>>>
>>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?
>>>>
>>>> Quite possibly.
>>>
>>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.[/color]
>>
>> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's
>> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article[/color]
>
>Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new
>discoveries![/color]
Did you read it on a tablet? The positioning of the photos was irritating, even
when using a 10.1" tablet.
I was a bit surprised that this sort of survey hadn't been done before. Do some
archeologists think that this sort of survey is cheating?
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
02-09-2014, 11.16.59
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:25:07 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
>wrote:
>[color=green]
>>Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
>>>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
>>>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?
>>>>>
>>>>> Quite possibly.
>>>>
>>>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.
>>>
>>> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's
>>> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article[/color]
>>
>>Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new
>>discoveries![/color]
>
>Did you read it on a tablet? The positioning of the photos was irritating, even
>when using a 10.1" tablet.
>
>I was a bit surprised that this sort of survey hadn't been done before. Do some
>archeologists think that this sort of survey is cheating?[/color]
More discoveries. Read the comments.
[url]http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/sep/01/stonehenge-dry-spell-grass-perfect-circle?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2[/url]
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
02-09-2014, 14.23.33
|
|
Re: Stonehenge
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:16:59 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:25:07 +0200, Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
>>wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC), Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Martin <me@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT), Surreyman
>>>>>> <alanspencer3@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:02:40 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
>>>>>>>> September 2014 Smithsonian has an article describing new discoveries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought we'd seen TV progs about this sort of stuff some time back?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quite possibly.
>>>>>
>>>>> There. Was a pretty good one(BBC,I think) i have a link to somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> There have been so many. Only somebody who has seen them and read September's
>>>> Smithsonian Magazine can say if the BBC has already covered the article
>>>
>>>Just read the article. I'd love to see the TV program on the new
>>>discoveries![/color]
>>
>>Did you read it on a tablet? The positioning of the photos was irritating, even
>>when using a 10.1" tablet.
>>
>>I was a bit surprised that this sort of survey hadn't been done before. Do some
>>archeologists think that this sort of survey is cheating?[/color]
>
>More discoveries. Read the comments.
>
>[url]http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/sep/01/stonehenge-dry-spell-grass-perfect-circle?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2[/url][/color]
The TV programme is on BBC 2 on Thursday
[url]http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/c4tkng/operation-stonehenge-what-lies-beneath--series-1---episode-1[/url]
1/2. Stonehenge is one of the most enigmatic and fascinating historical sites
that this country has to offer, and that's largely for one reason - try as they
might, historians have next to no idea what the huge stone monoliths were for,
or how they got there. There's no end of theories, of course, but none of them
so far have been conclusive. That may all be about to change, however. Recent
revolutionary research has just been undertaken which, over the course of just a
few years, has yielded some fascinating insights into the site. Drawing on this
new data, archaeologists might finally be able to put to bed some of its
mysteries, as this two-part programme reveals the five-year project's findings.
--
Martin in Zuid Holland
|
Strumenti discussione |
Cerca in questa discussione |
|
|
Modalità visualizzazione |
Modalità lineare
|
Regole di scrittura
|
Tu non puoi inserire nuovi messaggi
Tu non puoi rispondere ai messaggi
Tu non puoi inviare files
Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
Il codice vB è Disattivato
Il codice [IMG] è Disattivato
Il codice HTML è Disattivato
|
|
|
Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Adesso sono le 11.07.35.
| |