|
|
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
10-03-2005, 20.37.06
|
|
Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:44 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
<hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Remember also that while 50 PSI blast may not be enough to destroy the
>tank, it's still going to fling around the crew, perhaps fatally.
>Still, the radiation kill radius of an ERW is going to be considerably
>wider than the blast radius.[/color]
Versus a tank of course.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
|
Strumenti discussione |
Cerca in questa discussione |
|
|
Modalità visualizzazione |
Modalità lineare
|
Regole di scrittura
|
Tu non puoi inserire nuovi messaggi
Tu non puoi rispondere ai messaggi
Tu non puoi inviare files
Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
Il codice vB è Disattivato
Il codice [IMG] è Disattivato
Il codice HTML è Disattivato
|
|
|
Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Adesso sono le 08.35.20.
| |