|
|
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
29-04-2005, 06.29.41
|
|
Re: KLM incident raises security questions
"Dr. George O. Bizzigotti" wrote:[color=blue]
>
> I'm not familiar with all the USSR shoot downs, but my understanding
> is that at least in the KAL007 case, one rationale that was offered
> was that KAL007 was miles away from "approved" air routes and over an
> area that was at the time heavily used by the Soviet military.[/color]
The USSR at the time didn't permit any overflights of their territory.
The Korean airlines planes (both of them) were supposed to skirt the
international boundary off the shore of USSR territory, but instead
managed to fly over the country, hence the hostile action.
|
Strumenti discussione |
Cerca in questa discussione |
|
|
Modalità visualizzazione |
Modalità lineare
|
Regole di scrittura
|
Tu non puoi inserire nuovi messaggi
Tu non puoi rispondere ai messaggi
Tu non puoi inviare files
Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
Il codice vB è Disattivato
Il codice [IMG] è Disattivato
Il codice HTML è Disattivato
|
|
|
Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Adesso sono le 08.48.05.
| |