|
|
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
03-04-2005, 01.34.17
|
|
Re: Digital Photography Survives the Test of Time?
poldy writes:
[color=blue]
> Note, digital photo prints outlast silver halide-derived prints?[/color]
Nobody really knows at this point. Time will tell.
[color=blue]
> As more people use digital cameras, many are making homemade prints. Yet
> many shutterbugs could end up disappointed by the shelf life of their
> photos.[/color]
Most people don't make prints, anyway. And more and more go to labs to
have them made, and lab prints (which use the same processes whether the
print is electronic or film-based in origin) are better-looking,
cheaper, and more durable than home prints.
[color=blue]
> ... printer makers are trying to hold on to their lucrative
> market of selling photo paper and ink cartridges to consumers.[/color]
This is not a good strategy over the long term.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
|
Strumenti discussione |
Cerca in questa discussione |
|
|
Modalità visualizzazione |
Modalità lineare
|
Regole di scrittura
|
Tu non puoi inserire nuovi messaggi
Tu non puoi rispondere ai messaggi
Tu non puoi inviare files
Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
Il codice vB è Disattivato
Il codice [IMG] è Disattivato
Il codice HTML è Disattivato
|
|
|
Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Adesso sono le 13.12.33.
| |