Discussione: Re: Stonehenge
Visualizza messaggio singolo
  #2  
Vecchio 19-09-2014, 13.59.40
Mike Swift
 
Messaggi: n/a
Predefinito Re: Stonehenge

In article <mi1o1ap5uk2hgv26fhv13ikg6ua425gl2a@4ax.com>, Martin
<me@address.invalid> writes[color=blue]
>I wish archeologists would stick to the facts and not attribute everything to
>religious ceremonies. The evidence for human sacrifice was flimsy. You
>could just as well say that Richard III was killed in a human sacrifice. The
>claims that only children could have done the decoration of a dagger
>handle, turned out to be the opinion of a nano artist, who said that it had to
>be made by people who were under 21, not just children. Not sure where he
>got 21 from my eyesight changed to the point where I needed reading
>glasses, when I was in my early forties. The long palisade was interesting.
>How could they know that some of the posts were seven metres high. The
>explanation of what it was for was laughable[/color]

The palisade was simple, it was the stone age equivalent of the Berlin
or Israeli walls to keep the tribe next door out :-)

Mike

--
Michael Swift We do not regard Englishmen as foreigners.
Kirkheaton We look on them only as rather mad Norwegians.
Yorkshire Halvard Lange
Rispondi citando Condividi su facebook