Discussione: Re: Stonehenge
Visualizza messaggio singolo
  #3  
Vecchio 19-09-2014, 14.47.58
Martin
 
Messaggi: n/a
Predefinito Re: Stonehenge

On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:17:59 +0100, "GordonD" <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Martin" wrote in message
>news92o1apo08hsdpagep55vjr9bl8ce2mqkh@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:25:56 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Freeman
><Gordon@freeman.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>Howard.not@home.com (Howard) wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Fascinating program in parts but infested with romantisisatin and
>>> rampant nationalistic speculation delivered as fact.
>>> Why can't these archeologists be more like scientists and less like self
>>> promoters.[/color]
>>
>>
>>It's thanks to the unique way BBC programme making is funded, which means
>>the production companies tailor the programmes for sale to the American
>>market: as they've already got the BBC's funding in their pockets they
>>don't need to take British viewers into account.[/color]
>
>It's the result of archeology being at one time exclusively the subject of
>classical scholars. It's a very poor science. You can't blame the BBC for
>that.
>Tony Robinson's Channel 4 archeology programmes are very similar to the
>BBC's.
>==========================
>In other words, "very popular so the BBC stole the idea."[/color]

The BBC had archeology programmes and series long before Channel 4 existed.

Blame archeologists for the **** they talk and write not TV.
--

Martin in Zuid Holland



Rispondi citando Condividi su facebook